T
jackg1606:TROW, STT and SCHW are all in the same boat as MER. If you own any of these stocks you are going to be hurting in the next leg down in this market. SKF is the one you want to own at the moment.
All of these charts are showing the same overbought condition which is beginning to selloff.
The market has been highly efficient; the better companies have risen more since April 22nd than the companies that are preceived as of being of low-quality. I agree with you on the investment banks that they are risky (data on working capital ratios later).
STT up 11% since April 22nd
TROW is up 13% since April 22nd
GS, SCHW, and MER are all up less than 5%, while MS and BSC (not too suprisingly) have lost money since April 22nd.
Total Assets/Total Debt
Problems with Cash-Flow (except for MS and BSC) and problems with Balance Sheet (except for JPM)GS - 1.037 - atrocious cash flow
MER - 1.0323 - atrocious cash flow
BSC - 1.0307 (wasn't this the company that was near a chapter 11 filing) - actually pretty good cash flow; the main problem was that a certain long-term debt came due, was callable, or it was an investment gone bad. In my opinion, all five of these banks were vulnerable. This is evident since over $6 8 billion in loans were paid vs. those initiated according to the cash-flow from financing activities. That's usually a good sign, but it's not a good sign if you are forced to come up with money you don't have.
MS - 1.0315 - not as bad as last year cash-flow statement
JPM - 1.0856 - pretty good (ugly cash flow statement)
Excellent Balance Sheet and Cash-Flow StatementSTT - 1.0866 - pretty good; good to very good cash-flow statement
SCHW - 1.0968 - good cash-flow statement
TROW - 7.9477 - that's right, 8 times more assets than total debt; cash ratio of 1.644 - very nice cash-flow statement
This demonstrates why I really love tech companies; their cash ratio is far above 1; the cash ratio only involves cash + short-term investments over current liabilities. Their cash to long-term liabiltiies is pretty astounding and poised to handle a downturn with incredible ease (i.e. GOOG).
That's why I am not a chartist; it is very limited in the information that it provides. It can be great when you see a head and shoulders pattern or options action (when you put in buy or sell stops), but it's very illogical to rely on the chart alone (or to constantly perseverate about the chart). I think using charting along with the annual report is the way to invest in stocks.
I am solely a fundamental analysis guy. I seldomly refer to charts before making an investment decision as I don't believe in their effectiveness. Look at PNRA in 2002 and you will see why. I believe the market tends to be efficient and thus it's really hard to gain an advantage. However, from time to time, if you do your homework, it is possible to get a real deal like GOOG at its 52 week low, for example.
Aqua