|
|
mrr1003,
When buying E-Trade the issue you have to resolve is exactly how severe the housing downturn will be on the Companies financial posistion, primarily it's mortgage loan portfolio. Unfortunately, this quite critical task is far from simple. Despite its complexities we can make some general assumptions about what could happen in order to gauge whether or not your are justified in a purchase.
Below I have contained information regarding the composition of E-Trade Financials loan portfolio, which include its securities held for sale and its loans receivables. The information was retrieved from the Company's most recent 10-k.
Loans Receivables, net are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
| December 31, |
|
|
Variance |
|
| |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
$ |
10,870,214 |
|
|
$ |
7,091,664 |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
Home equity lines of credit (“HELOC”), Home equity installment loans (“HEIL”) and other |
|
|
11,809,008 |
|
|
|
8,106,820 |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
Consumer and other loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recreational vehicle |
|
|
2,292,356 |
|
|
|
2,692,055 |
|
|
(15 |
)% |
|
Marine |
|
|
651,764 |
|
|
|
752,645 |
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
Commercial |
|
|
219,008 |
|
|
|
89,098 |
|
|
146 |
% |
|
Credit card |
|
|
128,583 |
|
|
|
188,600 |
|
|
(32 |
)% |
|
Automobile |
|
|
77,533 |
|
|
|
235,388 |
|
|
(67 |
)% |
|
Other |
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
|
8,338 |
|
|
(56 |
)% |
|
Unamortized premiums, net |
|
|
388,153 |
|
|
|
323,573 |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(67,628 |
) |
|
|
(63,286 |
) |
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans receivable, net |
|
$ |
26,372,697 |
|
|
$ |
19,424,895 |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
Available-for-sale securities are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31, |
|
Variance |
|
| |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backed by U.S. government sponsored and Federal agencies |
|
$ |
9,109,307 |
|
$ |
9,427,521 |
|
(3 |
)% |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations and other |
|
|
1,108,385 |
|
|
995,891 |
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
10,217,692 |
|
|
10,423,412 |
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
2,161,728 |
|
|
1,365,754 |
|
58 |
% |
|
Publicly traded equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
458,674 |
|
|
288,365 |
|
59 |
% |
|
Corporate investments |
|
|
24,139 |
|
|
147,400 |
|
(84 |
)% |
|
FHLB stock |
|
|
244,212 |
|
|
198,700 |
|
23 |
% |
|
Other |
|
|
815,538 |
|
|
339,807 |
|
140 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
3,704,291 |
|
|
2,340,026 |
|
58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
13,921,983 |
|
$ |
12,763,438 |
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunetaly, E-Trade trade does not provide more comprehensive information on its mortgage loan portfolion, but we will try to work from this data. To my knowledege E-Trade primary problems are surrounding its asset-backed securities and CMO exposure. Therefore, let us tackle this first. Looking at the data we see that E-Trade's total asset-backed securities and CMO exposure is approximately $2.16 billion and $1.10 billion, respectively. Therefore, in a worse case scenario E-Trade Financial's maximum loss exposure related to such securities is capped at approximately $3.36 billion (this is under the assumption that they do not insure their portofolio. If they do their loss exposure will be less). E-Trade has approximately $4.20 billion in equity. Thus, if E-Trade were to write down the value of its entire asset-backed securities and CMO portfolio the Company's worse case scenario equity would fall to about $840 million, which is about $1.97/share. The companies average price to book multiple over the past ten years is about 2x (I exluded the abnormally high price/book mulitpe of 4.45x in 1999). Thus, if we accept this as E-Trade's fair price to book multiple the implied fair value price after a material write down would be about $3.94, which is about what the market values the Company at now. Therefore, it appears that the market is expecting E-Trade to face such a worse case scenario, or some combination that and increaseing losses on its real estate loans. I would argue, however, that such a worse case scenario while possible, is probably unlikely. Perhaps a more reasonable situation is for E-Trade to write down approximately 60-80% of its asset-backed securites and CMO portfolio and to experience a increase in its loan loss reserves of about 0.30 to 0.50 basis points. Under this assumption E-Trade would could loose somewhere between $2.15-$2.85 billion in total equity, which would place total equity somewhere between $1.35-$2.05 biilion, or approximately $3.17-$4.81/share. This would imply fair value prices between $6.34-$9.62 using 2x book as the fair price multiple. Thus, assuming it takes about 5 years for everything to settle out and E-Trade to return to a normal status the implied compounded rate of return under these latter situations would be approximately 9.65% and 19.19%, repsectively (assuming a $4 purchase price). Therefore, while the returns have the potential to be compelling, I would argue that given the uncertaintly surrounding the issue the returns are not high enough to compensate one for the assumed risk. However, others may have a different opinion. After all things may not turn out as bad as I have suggested above. Also, I have not made any estimates for growth. If, for example, E-Trade returns to its normal 10yr compounded annual growth rate in book value of 13.37% in, say, 2009 and maintains that growth until 2012 total book value/share would approximate $4.62, $7.01 billion in each of two situations I discussed above. This would imply prices of $9.24, and $14.02 and equate compounded annual 5YR returns at 18.23% and 28.51%, respectively, which I think compensates one accordingly.
Angell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
****IGNORE THE INFORMATION BELOW****
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
| |
|
Cost Basis |
|
Fair Value |
|
Cost Basis |
|
Fair Value |
|
Cost Basis |
|
Fair Value |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backed by U.S. Government sponsored and Federal Agencies |
|
$ |
9,375,444 |
|
$ |
9,109,307 |
|
$ |
9,687,666 |
|
$ |
9,427,521 |
|
$ |
7,938,135 |
|
$ |
7,793,207 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations and other |
|
|
1,127,650 |
|
|
1,108,385 |
|
|
1,014,582 |
|
|
995,891 |
|
|
1,266,736 |
|
|
1,258,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
10,503,094 |
|
|
10,217,692 |
|
|
10,702,248 |
|
|
10,423,412 |
|
|
9,204,871 |
|
|
9,052,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
2,163,538 |
|
|
2,161,728 |
|
|
1,376,315 |
|
|
1,365,754 |
|
|
2,789,471 |
|
|
2,796,429 |
|
FHLB stock |
|
|
244,212 |
|
|
244,212 |
|
|
198,700 |
|
|
198,700 |
|
|
92,005 |
|
|
92,005 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
620,261 |
|
|
632,747 |
|
|
167,848 |
|
|
168,850 |
|
|
136,362 |
|
|
136,671 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
74,293 |
|
|
72,661 |
|
|
74,931 |
|
|
72,760 |
|
| | |