All content in the ZeccoShare community is generated by its members and does not contain advice or recommendations on behalf of Zecco Holdings or Zecco Trading. More>>
Content Name: CommunityDisclaimerShortLeftNav
Preview Revision #:
Active Revision #:
Edit Content
StocksandBlogs.com

Is Walmart Bad for the Economy?

Since everyone on and off Wall Street has an opinion of Walmart (WMT) and the recent controversy that surrounds it, I figured it is my turn to sing the song that is Walmart.

First, I want to lay out the controversies that surround this behemoth:

Walmart is accused of unjust labor practices - this includes giving their workers minimum wage and not providing health insurance. My take on this - minimum wages are set by the federal and state governments. There are many companies, both small and large, that give only minimum wage to their employees. Now on the positive side, Walmart saves an average of over $2000 per year for those who shop there regularly. These shoppers who save so much, include the same demographic that works at Walmart. As for health care, Walmart is disadvantaged only by the fact that it is the largest retailer in the world. If that were not the case, this would not be an issue. Aside from Starbucks, no large employer I know of gives health insurance to part time employees, and this is due to the high cost of health care, which in turn is due to the high cost of insurance that doctors/hospitals must purchase to fend off lawsuits, which in turn .... I could go on and on. There are CEO's that make millions, yet are often caught golfing in the afternoon - and thats fine by me - but then I ask those who accuse Walmart of unfair labor practices, why they don't ask United Health or Aetna to cut down their executive salaries by 75%? They can then afford to cut down insurance premiums, which would then bring down the cost of healthcare.

Walmart is also accused of harming smaller "mom and pop" businesses through pricing power. Yes - I believe it is called free market capitalism. People accused Microsoft of pricing power through monopoly too. Has anyone ever really done a detailed analysis of how much Walmart has hurt these small businesses and compared it against how much money it has saved shoppers? I bet the latter number is heavier. Most small shops that offer good products and service at reasonable prices should be able to survive the Walmart threat.

It is said that Walmart brings down property values in surrounding areas by its sheer presence. That is ridiculous. Whats next? Should we shut down the Salvation Army drop offices because they attract low income shoppers? Should we also discriminate against Denny's and IHop's? On the flip side, golf courses and high rises drive up the price of surrounding properties, making those areas unaffordable for middle America. Why not lobby against those too?

Walmart is hiring illegal immigrants. Again, its sheer size gets in the way of Walmart. Every car wash I know of in Southern California, and believe me there are plenty of them, hire illegal immigrants. I think we need to be fair here. Most American's complain about minimum wages being too low, so really the only people willing to work for such low wages are illegal immigrants. On one hand we complain about low wages, but we also complain about those who are willing to work for these low wages.

The affect of Walmart on our economy is significant. From employing hundreds of thousands of people to saving customers a lot of money to ensuring that competitors like Target (TGT) and KMart (SHLD) keep their prices in check (thereby inadvertently also saving money for those who don't shop Walmart), this giant retailer needs to focus on its core business to make money for its shareholders and to save money for their customers rather than fight off controversy. I say let them do their job. Perhaps they might have provided their employees with health insurance if they didn't have to dish out the legal fees for these battles. Hey lets go after those lawyers for charging so much!!! ..... Sigh
 
In conclusion, I'd just like to say that Walmart, in my opinion, is good for the economy. It is good for the people that shop there and those that shop at competitor's. It is good for those that it employs because otherwise they might not have a job at all. Now if they pay below minimum wage, they need to be brought to justice, otherwise, ff people have a problem with their practices, I have a simple suggestion - don't shop there.

-- Faisal Laljee
Full Disclosure: I don't own any shares of Walmart. I don't shop at Walmart primarily because they have been blocked out of Los Angeles. But that is not to say I have never shopped there, although I must say I prefer shopping at Costco, Best Buy, Target, Trader Joe's and specialty retailers for their products, service and atmosphere.
Published Sunday, December 10, 2006 7:11 AM by Faisal Laljee
Content Name: blogInnerAdPartBottom
Preview Revision #:
Active Revision #:
Edit Content

RSSRSS Syndication Feed

Or, add this feed directly to your favorite reader by clicking the button below. That way, you’ll never miss a post.

Add to NewsGator Add to Rojo Add to Pluck Add to my AOL Add to Netvibes Add to Pageflakes Add to my Yahoo Add to Bloglines Add to Google

Comments

 

MarketDance said:

I really like your analysis, and have been considering this issue for some time.  I shop at Wal-Mart, and I have been a free-market proponent forever, but I have been hearing more and more comments from friends/acquaintances who will not patronize Wal-Mart for various reasons (most of which you have described above).  Thanks for your thoughts,

MD
December 11, 2006 12:18 AM
 

argiope said:

I just envy those who have the free time to stress over such an irrelevant argument.  This is not directed at you, Faisal, rather the very same individuals you are referencing in your comments.
December 11, 2006 3:27 PM
 

argiope said:

Uh oh, sorry... I hit 'enter' to create a new line for my post and it called the 'submit' button...
December 11, 2006 3:28 PM
 

argiope said:

yet again... Anyway... Just wanted to support your blog entry and question those who care so much why it matters where America buys toilet paper and etc.  It's just one of many retailers who offer everyday essential needs for everyday life.  There are only three parties who really have any leverage to say much:  customers, employees, and shareholders.  Everyone else can go buy their toilet paper somewhere else!
December 11, 2006 3:38 PM
 

Faisal Laljee said:

Thanks for your comments and positive feedback MD and theArgiope.

-- Faisal Laljee
December 11, 2006 8:16 PM
 

mybaloney said:

I buy my toilet paper at Dollar General because my taxes pay for most Walmart employees Medicaid and food stamp benefits
December 15, 2006 10:34 AM
 

smallcapsurfer2020 said:

In California a Professor of UC Davis or Stanford did a research report on the pro's and cons of Walmart.  In many Walmart's they were more than happy he stated "To show women how to sign up for Welfare and Food Stamps since their job would not sustain a living wage.   What is a living wage?  That is a great question since so many in the USA seem to have this priveledge escape them.  Walmart is always bombarded with Class Action Lawsuits.  Some accused their store directors of erasing their overtime or overruling the computer so they would have that extra $10 removed from their checks.  Sam Walton would be sick to his stomach if he knew how greedy and selfish the individuals are that took over his company..  Sam seemed to be loved by his people.  He gave out stock options and provided a fair wage.  Sam belived in principles that Walmart seems to have left at his grave site.  Sam bought as much American product and never got caught sewing "Made in the USA" on clothes made in China!  The facts are stacked against the lack of human rights.  As for the Economy they claim that Walmart actually shaves off about 3/4 percent of inflation off the whole USA.  If they spent more time treating their employees like Humans instead of disposabile waste the Lawsuits might actuallly drop!  Go Figure that one out!
May 6, 2007 9:04 AM
 

pkotharu said:

I am a pharmacist (not with Walmart) and I must say how much I love their recent $4 generic program. The list includes almost 300 most commonly used generic drugs and imagine how much money they are saving for uninsured and for insured those who have high copay. They forced many other chain pharmacies including the one I am working either to match their price or come down with other benefits to patients.
May 24, 2007 10:21 AM
 

GlobalCitibankFunds said:

My First Post. Reviewing Faisal Laljees' intial post attending to Walmart. I skimmed through the initial point(s) and have a blended response and query. I will state for the record, I am not a Walmart shareholder, have never been in a Walmart and a few other retailers mentioned by others in replies, have no strong opinion of a positive or negative position on Walmart so allow me to learn from the author, various authors of reply, I would appreciate hearing from those that have strong evaluations to the inital response and finally, of all the posts on Zeeco, what % of those commenting have substantial travel with macro-economic backgrounds whereby those that comment, actually speak from a local perspective (perhaps City/County) OR have been in a Walmart overseas.

My point, is to understand where the knowledge of comments are derived and any other information or opinion of those who post information, data, questions, comments etc so I can understand the community of which I am new to. I have a question for anyone and please, try not to look this up. Just use a guess or if you know, state the percentage. How many US Citizen's have Passports 12-2006 and prior to take away the recent rush of those who climb to the north and south; Canada and the South Americas respectively. I am open to answer any questions of my interest to understand the Zeeco community. Properity and riches to all.
June 8, 2007 7:14 AM
 

noVus_ said:

Capitalism and Free market does not mean "anything goes", let the dollar figure it out, and the result is naturally good.  That would be taking advantage of the freedoms that Capitalism provides, and not treating the system responsibly.  Wal-mart is guilty of that.

Trying to take the blame away from Wal-mart and onto the goverment regarding the fair wage issue, is just begging  the question.  Wal-mart takes advantage of a very poor policy of the government.  That does not lessen their guilt.  It exaggerates it, when you consider that you have companies out there like Costco, that STARTS OFF their employees at $12.00 an hour, and averages $17.00 an hour.

There are other advantages to Capitalism and Free Market, that very few people want to take advantage of.  Such as being able to punish businesses that only see the short term profit gains, by sacrificing the wrong thing - namely - their employees.  

Look to Jim Sinegal at Costco.  That's a business I'll frequent, because I love how the man treats his employees.  Walmart?  Will never see the inside of my wallet, or my portfolio.  Not to mention, there store here in Monroe Michigan is BEYOND filthy.  I accompanied a friend inside the store, and was appalled at the disarray and filth throughout the store. Typical of a business that has a mindset wherein their conscience is not bothered by taking advantage of the freedoms that Capitalism provides.
July 14, 2007 11:25 AM
 

sport302 said:

I just wanted to add I was a logistic executive for Wal-Marts major competitor Target.  I honestly believe as a whole that all the major retailers do suffer from their size and their inability to relate to individual employees because of their size.  

I finally resigned from Target because I simply did not agree with the approach they were taking in regards to entry level employees.  Entry level employees are simply statistics on a spread sheet entered as an expense.  It becomes a nasty nasty game deciding which employees get their hours cut and which get to go find 2nd and 3rd jobs to pay for their survival.

The topper for me was when they started sending all us supervisors to mandatory union busting training.  Now I am not a union guy and never have been but the whole seminar just seemed like an unethical brainwashing session.  It was the deciding factor that led me to leave Target after being there for 10 years.  It simply made me realize to become truly successful in that environment you had to treat your employees like they were basically an expense that you had to treat like garbage.

Also if any of you truly feel employees could form a union within any major retailer without being retaliated against (i.e. FIRED) you are kidding yourself.  The laws governing the formation of unions are so  outdated and infective that they provided no employee of a large company a fighting chance or protection.

So who is to blame?  In the end it is the consumer in my opinion.  Consumers want cheap products from China and the major retailers are providing them with what they want.  Could the major retailers treat employees with dignity, of course but they won't.  Profits simply outweigh employees when it comes to the major retailers.  Unless the CEOs of all the major retailers change their ways do not look for a change in this philosophy anytime soon.  Their competition with each other will always have a negative effect on entry level employees.

So is Wal-Mart good for the economy?  In my opinion NO.  I think it helps China's economy much more than our own.      

August 25, 2007 5:11 AM
 

SeanK said:

Wal-mart is the best thing to ever come along to help low income and poor folks in this country.  Before Wal-Mart those people spent a high proportion of their income on various necessities.  I'd say if Wal-mart went away those people would suffer.  So in this respect, Wal-Mart has helped.  

Let's not forget the average middle class family that is looking save money on groceries and household goods will almost always go to WM if they can.  I can tell you when we had our twins we were thankful for WM's great prices on diapers, baby formula, baby food, etc.  

Having said all that Wal-Mart has some real problems to overcome.  People HATE shopping at their stores.  My wife and I will only shop WM and SAM's when we have to do it.  The shopping experience is terrible and getting worse.  If they don't fix the shopping experience soon, they will go the way of K-Mart which used to be the Wal-Mart of its day.  

Target is a nicer store than WM, and Costco is far superior to SAM's.  It's too bad Sam Walton's business has become such a sorry experience.
August 26, 2007 2:25 PM
 

WizDumb said:

Walmart id great for China, and benign/positive for the USA. I believe the Employees that take umbrage with Wal-Mart are the low-level pedestrian workers like cashiers, shelf stockers etc. In my opinion jobs like those should never be looked on as a career. They should only be a springboard to better... or a temporary solution. If we as a nation desire it to be acceptable to be common smock worker with a great lifestyle then we are doomed as a culture.

The only bone I have to pick with Wal-mart is their devotion to China. If they sold more USA products I could look upon them as good for america. Because with their influence , YES, they could bring manufacturing back to the USA. Call me naive but look at the way well established firms have bent over backwards to serve thei masters. If walmart called for inexpensive USA made goods...guess what...IT WOULD HAPPEN.

:)
September 4, 2007 9:06 PM
 

Faisal Laljee said:

Wizdum - If manufacturing were to be brought to the US, how much do you think it would cost relative to China? Keep in mind labor unions, insurance, taxes etc. The US economy is no longer a manufacturing based economy. It is service based. It is science based. It is business oriented. Just look at how badly Ford, GM and Chrystler are doing. They manufacture cars, albeit mediocre ones, but their challenges and costs lie in pension programs, health care and union costs. So even cars, which were invented by Americans are manufactured outside of the US. Most people don't realize that Ford and GM manufacture a lot of parts in Mexico and just assemble cars in the US. My point is - if cost of goods were to go up by manufacturing them in the US, the consumer would be hurt and the economy would suffer. Walmart pays less to their employees - well at least they employ people. What do you think the local businesses pay? The 7/11's, the car washes, the supermarkets are all guilty of the same. And if they paid their employees more, they would have to charge consumers more - and we already complain about higher prices, inflation, gas, housing, loans etc.

Its a vicious cycle and I sure don't have all the answers. All I am saying is that Walmart is doing what all American companies are doing - outsourcing.
November 6, 2007 9:26 PM
 

reconzulu said:

Wal-Mart is Mega Major League! We would not have this discussion if they were not.  My wife is very thrifty about buying grocery items, and she will tell me she hates to go to Wal-Mart, BUT she can not beat their prices on grocery items.  One item was found at a national chain for 4 bucks, she found the same item for 2.50. If other want to copy the footprint they have sit, they may be successful as well. I DO NOT HAVE STOCK IN THEM BY THE WAY.
December 15, 2007 5:08 PM
 

el grillo said:

I think what is scary is that when Wal-mart comes to a town or city, they take all the customers away from the small shops. What that does is eliminate options for the workers so they end up getting squeezed.  
October 6, 2008 8:15 PM
Anonymous comments are disabled

The above content is provided for educational and informational purposes only, does not constitute a recommendation to enter in any securities transactions or to engage in any of the investment strategies presented in such content, and does not represent the opinions of Zecco or its employees.


RSSRSS Syndication Feed

Or, add this feed directly to your favorite reader by clicking the button below. That way, you’ll never miss a post.

Add to NewsGator Add to Rojo Add to Pluck Add to my AOL Add to Netvibes Add to Pageflakes Add to my Yahoo Add to Bloglines Add to Google
StocksandBlogs.com
StocksandBlogs.com provides stock tips, equity research and markets commentary. This site will give you investment ideas that you can apply to your financial portfolio. By sharing my money making stock tips and research, I hope I can help you manage your wealth better - whether you are a long-term investor or looking for a quick trade, a bull or a bear. From Wall Street to Walmart, Commodities to Foreign Exchange, you will find it all here. My name is Faisal Laljee and you can email me anytime at flaljee@mail.stocksandblogs.com
Content Name: BlogLayoutRight
Preview Revision #:
Active Revision #:
Edit Content


ZeccoShare is currently in Beta mode. In case you wish to provide feedback, please post it in the ZeccoShare Forum.

ZeccoShare provides a confined and secured environment. The information you share (e.g. profile, holdings, trades, performance) is only displayed to other Zecco members. Guest (i.e. not signed in) are not able to see any individual member information. Guests will only be able to see anonymous, aggregated community data.

Zecco members marked with a ‘Zecco Associate’ medal are employees of Zecco.com. They are not registered representatives of any broker/dealer, and are not registered with any national securities exchange. All information displayed and all posts made by these users are their personal information and opinion, and not the opinion or information of Zecco.com. Zecco.com is not a broker/dealer, has no access to material non-public information about publicly traded companies, and does not make any recommendations regarding the purchase or sale of any security.


All content in the ZeccoShare community is provided for educational and informational purposes only, does not constitute a recommendation to enter in any securities transactions or to engage in any of the investment strategies presented in such content, and does not represent the opinions of Zecco Holdings or its employees. Your use of the ZeccoShare Community is conditioned to your acceptance of all Disclosures and Terms of Service.
Close [X]
Content Name: CommunityDisclaimerLong
Preview Revision #:
Active Revision #:
Edit Content

More details about online investing and trading stocks with Zecco Trading:


Zecco Trading has reconstructed the mold of options trading and stock trading online, making it easier than ever for you to get smart and act smart with your money. Need to sell stock or buy stock online, interested in penny stocks? With Zecco Trading, you get 10 free online stock trades each month with $2,500 or more. That’s right, free online stock trading. Otherwise, it's only $4.50 per stock trade. Where else will you find a discount broker who looks out for your best interest by providing you free online stock trading and a community of investors to share ideas with?

The ZeccoShare Community is a great compliment to Zecco Trading. With ZeccoShare you can learn online about stock trading and get advice on stock trades and options trades from people who invest like you and who have similar risk tolerance. Who says online investing is complex? It doesn’t have to be. With ZeccoShare you’ll be able to ask questions, contribute investing ideas, share your investment portfolio (but not any dollar amounts), share your stock trades or options trades and your investing performance to help everyone learn to be a better investor.

Read our education section for information on How to Trade Options.

Terms of Service - Privacy Policy


Zecco.com is a financial portal of Zecco Holdings, Inc., which also provides access to Zecco Trading, Inc.’s trading service. Zecco Holdings, inc. is not a securities broker/dealer. All securities and investments are offered to self-directed investors by Zecco Trading, Inc. Member FINRA /SIPC. More information is located on the disclosures page.

At Zecco Trading, you can make up to 10 free stock trades in any one month that you maintain a $2500 minimum account net equity. After that, you pay only $4.50 per stock trade. Options trades are $4.50 plus $.50 per contract. Only the first account of any account type is eligible for the Zecco Trading, Free Trading program. Any multiple accounts of the same type with the same registration are not eligible for the free trading program. Free Trading Program is only available through Zecco.com. $0 minimum to open cash and IRA accounts.

* Margin accounts require a $2,000 minimum balance for opening and trading on margin. Margin trading involves risks and is not suitable for all accounts.

Options involve risk and are not suitable for all investors. Please read Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options.

Multiple leg options strategies involve additional risks and multiple commissions, and may result in complex tax treatments. Please read Spread Trading Disclosure.

Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses of a mutual fund or ETF carefully before investing. A mutual fund/ETF's prospectus contains this and other information, and should be read carefully before investing.

System response and access times may vary due to market conditions, system performance, and other factors.

The content of Zecco Holdings, Inc.'s and Zecco Trading, Inc.'s websites, including research, tools and securities symbols, is for educational and informational purposes and should not be intended as a recommendation or solicitation to engage in any particular securities transaction or investment strategy. You alone are responsible for evaluating the benefits and risks associated with the use of our services or products and to decide which securities and strategies better suit your financial situation and goals, risk profile, etc. The projections regarding the probability of investment outcomes are hypothetical and not guaranteed for accuracy or completeness. They do not reflect actual investment outcomes and are not guarantees of future results. Projections and tools' calculations do not take into consideration commissions, margin interest and other costs that will impact investment outcomes. All investments involve risk. Losses may exceed the principal invested. Past performance of a security, market, or financial product does not guarantee future results. Neither Zecco Holdings, Inc. nor Zecco Trading, Inc. offers any tax, legal or financial advice.

No consideration was paid for any testimonials displayed on this website. Your experience may vary, and the testimonials are no guarantee of future performance or success. Zecco Holdings, Inc., Zecco Trading, Inc.'s and their independent providers are not liable for any errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance upon information contained herein. By accessing our websites, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.

Market Data Copyright © QuoteMedia. Data delayed 15 to 20 minutes unless otherwise indicated. RT = Realtime, EOD = End Of Day, PD = Previous Day. Powered by QuoteMedia. Terms of Use.

© 2006-2008 Zecco Holdings, Inc. and Zecco Trading, Inc., Member FINRA /SIPC All rights reserved.